
Am I the only one wondering if this whole "citizen journalist" thing is such a great idea after all? In asking this question on the internet, am I a citizen journalist now? Between fake journalistic sites like Breitbart and the celebrity pundit fest Huffington Post, not to mention the big cable news networks and their "let's go to the tweets" democratization/dumbing down of information-sharing, where did actual bona fide fact-finding, heavy-on-the-research journalism go? The mainstream largely exists as something else now - a tool, a device, a weapon that in the hands of its holders serves mainly to misinform, disinform, obfuscate reality, and perpetuate the big, noisy distracting cartoon show devised to keep us stupid and confused, or at the very least actively engaged in the this-vs.-that, us-vs.-them shuck and jive while they dazzle us with buzz-words and stabbing-edge graphics.
I know there's plenty to say in favour of citizen journalism/activism, and I want to believe that the internet and social media as it exists today are our strongest bulwarks against the stomping boot, but it seems that the downsides are quite pronounced as well. Increasingly I find that getting to the bottom of anything now requires a labyrinthian trek through the internet, sifting and sorting and cross-referencing like it's a job, where some guy's opinion or bias is sprayed everywhere along with the truth or all too often passed off as the truth.
If we've figured out that we're being lied to, that we've been lied to for some time - now what? The "new media" - yes, with facetious air quotes - often seems almost as bad as the old media, but what can one expect when anyone can play? It's like there's a new foot-in-mouth comedy of errors every other day involving some would be gonzo goof making like a journalist. And once again we're left wondering where the truth went. At times it feels like no matter what, the bullshit wins.
Anyway, I'm off to ambush Bono!